<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ywca health andwellness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:49:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Team Obama to explain why after promising health Obama rejected public option for corporate services? by Zee-ster</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/19/can-team-obama-to-explain-why-after-promising-health-obama-rejected-public-option-for-corporate-services/comment-page-1/#comment-3992</link>
		<dc:creator>Zee-ster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/19/can-team-obama-to-explain-why-after-promising-health-obama-rejected-public-option-for-corporate-services/#comment-3992</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s a crappy service no one wants but everyone has to pay for just like government itself.

Edit: I 2nd what Dave says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s a crappy service no one wants but everyone has to pay for just like government itself.</p>
<p>Edit: I 2nd what Dave says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatives, why do you think the public would put private health insurance out of business? by Pro Con</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/05/conservatives-why-do-you-think-a-public-option-will-put-private-health-care-insurance-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/05/conservatives-why-do-you-think-a-public-option-will-put-private-health-care-insurance-out-of-business/#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>Case in point:
California, my home, enacted legislation many years ago that required employers to carry insurance for employees in case they were hurt on the job - Workers Compensation Insurance. This was already the law when I went into business in 1979, so I bought worker&#039;s comp insurance from an agent along with general liability and vehicle insurance.

Business owners complained about the excessive cost of this insurance, so the State came up with an alternative plan called the State Compensation Fund. I knew it was out there, but I liked my agent and was happy with my insurance. One day, I received a letter that Farmers would no longer be offering workers comp in California. My agent switched me to another insurance company I&#039;d never heard of and all was well. Eventually, they left too. I was unable to find insurance at this point except the State Compensation Fund seemed to be alive and well. That is where my coverage is today.

A quick Google search for &quot;Workers comp California&quot; revealed a page full of attorneys and the State Compensation Fund, but no private insurance companies.

That, my friend, is the &quot;single payer&quot; risk we face.

Will it happen? I don&#039;t honestly know, but it could. Obama&#039;s plan wouldn&#039;t put us there, if he sticks to it, but other presidents are going to follow and who knows what they&#039;ll do? And don&#039;t forget, Pelosi has a lock on her House position as long as she wants it. No one in San Francisco would ever vote her out. They&#039;ve been communists since the 1960s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Case in point:<br />
California, my home, enacted legislation many years ago that required employers to carry insurance for employees in case they were hurt on the job &#8211; Workers Compensation Insurance. This was already the law when I went into business in 1979, so I bought worker&#8217;s comp insurance from an agent along with general liability and vehicle insurance.</p>
<p>Business owners complained about the excessive cost of this insurance, so the State came up with an alternative plan called the State Compensation Fund. I knew it was out there, but I liked my agent and was happy with my insurance. One day, I received a letter that Farmers would no longer be offering workers comp in California. My agent switched me to another insurance company I&#8217;d never heard of and all was well. Eventually, they left too. I was unable to find insurance at this point except the State Compensation Fund seemed to be alive and well. That is where my coverage is today.</p>
<p>A quick Google search for &#8220;Workers comp California&#8221; revealed a page full of attorneys and the State Compensation Fund, but no private insurance companies.</p>
<p>That, my friend, is the &#8220;single payer&#8221; risk we face.</p>
<p>Will it happen? I don&#8217;t honestly know, but it could. Obama&#8217;s plan wouldn&#8217;t put us there, if he sticks to it, but other presidents are going to follow and who knows what they&#8217;ll do? And don&#8217;t forget, Pelosi has a lock on her House position as long as she wants it. No one in San Francisco would ever vote her out. They&#8217;ve been communists since the 1960s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health Care Debate? by Tony</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/23/health-care-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/23/health-care-debate/#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>As good as that is, it is not good enough. You sound like the kind of person who thinks from their heart and not their mind. You don&#039;t understand the complexities involved or the consequences of a massive public healthcare system, or of the fact that much of Americans health problems are there own fault. Also, you seem to not understand the long-term economic situation this nation is in. I am for  Universal Healthcare System, but not one directly managed by the government, and not one where their is not generation of wealth from the systems existance. There must be a profit motive for the system to be worthwhile. Also, we need better healthcare approaches, such as curing people and not just treating them. That will take private money to do, which will be discouraged if the government takes center stage. Purely private systems dont work either, but neither do government systems. The need is for a partnership of the two, and for a change in the healthcare systems structure, and not its motive. The more you dig into this, the more you will find their are more arguements against a public health care system than for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As good as that is, it is not good enough. You sound like the kind of person who thinks from their heart and not their mind. You don&#8217;t understand the complexities involved or the consequences of a massive public healthcare system, or of the fact that much of Americans health problems are there own fault. Also, you seem to not understand the long-term economic situation this nation is in. I am for  Universal Healthcare System, but not one directly managed by the government, and not one where their is not generation of wealth from the systems existance. There must be a profit motive for the system to be worthwhile. Also, we need better healthcare approaches, such as curing people and not just treating them. That will take private money to do, which will be discouraged if the government takes center stage. Purely private systems dont work either, but neither do government systems. The need is for a partnership of the two, and for a change in the healthcare systems structure, and not its motive. The more you dig into this, the more you will find their are more arguements against a public health care system than for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on should the tax payers have the &#8220;choice&#8221; to pay taxes towards the &#8220;public health option&#8221;? by C-K again</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/28/should-the-tax-payers-have-the-choice-to-pay-taxes-towards-the-public-health-option/comment-page-1/#comment-4672</link>
		<dc:creator>C-K again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/28/should-the-tax-payers-have-the-choice-to-pay-taxes-towards-the-public-health-option/#comment-4672</guid>
		<description>yes.

we should do the same thing with cap-and-trade, which is nothing more than a bullsh*t global warming bill. if cap-and-trade passes and it wrecks shop on employment in the energy industry, all the energy workers that voted for obama should be the ones to lose their jobs :0)

Alex- you mean the wars like the one in Iraq that the majority of dems voted FOR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes.</p>
<p>we should do the same thing with cap-and-trade, which is nothing more than a bullsh*t global warming bill. if cap-and-trade passes and it wrecks shop on employment in the energy industry, all the energy workers that voted for obama should be the ones to lose their jobs :0)</p>
<p>Alex- you mean the wars like the one in Iraq that the majority of dems voted FOR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on without a public option is health care reform not as good? by hoodrich69</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/19/without-a-public-option-is-health-care-reform-not-as-good/comment-page-1/#comment-4011</link>
		<dc:creator>hoodrich69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/19/without-a-public-option-is-health-care-reform-not-as-good/#comment-4011</guid>
		<description>$150 is not affordable? thats 4months worth of health insurance for the price of an ipod or an xbox. do you own an ipod or xbox. how much did your computer cost? what about your cell phone? i bet if you got rid of your cable and traded your cell phone for a basic land line you could afford the $150. sounds like you need to get your priorities strait. i don&#039;t think its fair for me to be forced to buy insurance or have my taxes raised so you can have a cell phone, xbox, ipod, and cable. where have you been looking? ehealthinsurance.com quoted me $79 and im a smoker. 

health care and health insurance are 2different things. they need to work on providing care directly and cutting out the middle man (insurance co) the best way to do this is a free market system. remember a few years ago when there was a problem with prescription drugs? walmart introduced a drug plan selling prescriptions for $40. then walgreens introduced a similar plan to compete. now the price is around 11$ thanks to the free market and competition.  i can also choose where i want to go to for a prescription.   

in 2007 walmart announced it had plans to open health clinics in its stores that would provide basic affordable care. to compete walgreens had plans for a similar program. but thanks to the gov barging in to &quot;fix&quot; everything that may not happen. gov red tape and bureaucracies drive prices up. 

what about that doctor in NY that offers unlimited visits for only $79 a month. he can perform 80% of all medical needs without the gov or insurance CO butting in and driving up cost. (the NY government tried shutting him down)  

basically there is no need for insurance companies for routing or basic care. insurance is only necessary to insure you against the risk of long term care. it is up to you and you alone to weigh the risks and decide if you need that. but with the burden of basic care taken off the insurance Co. and medical in general easily available the cost of insurance would go down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$150 is not affordable? thats 4months worth of health insurance for the price of an ipod or an xbox. do you own an ipod or xbox. how much did your computer cost? what about your cell phone? i bet if you got rid of your cable and traded your cell phone for a basic land line you could afford the $150. sounds like you need to get your priorities strait. i don&#8217;t think its fair for me to be forced to buy insurance or have my taxes raised so you can have a cell phone, xbox, ipod, and cable. where have you been looking? ehealthinsurance.com quoted me $79 and im a smoker. </p>
<p>health care and health insurance are 2different things. they need to work on providing care directly and cutting out the middle man (insurance co) the best way to do this is a free market system. remember a few years ago when there was a problem with prescription drugs? walmart introduced a drug plan selling prescriptions for $40. then walgreens introduced a similar plan to compete. now the price is around 11$ thanks to the free market and competition.  i can also choose where i want to go to for a prescription.   </p>
<p>in 2007 walmart announced it had plans to open health clinics in its stores that would provide basic affordable care. to compete walgreens had plans for a similar program. but thanks to the gov barging in to &#8220;fix&#8221; everything that may not happen. gov red tape and bureaucracies drive prices up. </p>
<p>what about that doctor in NY that offers unlimited visits for only $79 a month. he can perform 80% of all medical needs without the gov or insurance CO butting in and driving up cost. (the NY government tried shutting him down)  </p>
<p>basically there is no need for insurance companies for routing or basic care. insurance is only necessary to insure you against the risk of long term care. it is up to you and you alone to weigh the risks and decide if you need that. but with the burden of basic care taken off the insurance Co. and medical in general easily available the cost of insurance would go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public health in the U.S. by Jimmy J</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/21/public-health-care-in-the-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/21/public-health-care-in-the-usa/#comment-4038</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used government provided health care.  As a retired member of US Army, I&#039;m entitled to use military health care facilities.  Guess what?  I don&#039;t.  I have my own insurance.  I&#039;ve been paying my own freight my whole life and don&#039;t want to pay yours or anyone elses.  I&#039;ll take care of my family, you take care of yours.  Also, I suggest that as a British citizen, you stick to the problems in England.  As an American, I don&#039;t give a #*&gt;@ about what happens in England or how people govern themselves.  I&#039;ve heard some lovely stories about your public health care system that doesn&#039;t leave me all warm an fuzzy.  Brits seem to embrace the sacrifice of liberty on a regular  basis for an ever increasing big brother government.  That won&#039;t fly here.

Edit:

And I&#039;ll stick by my contention that European&#039;s need to mind their own #*$*@ business.  The only time you arrogant snobs need America is when your balls are in a vice from some petty tyrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used government provided health care.  As a retired member of US Army, I&#8217;m entitled to use military health care facilities.  Guess what?  I don&#8217;t.  I have my own insurance.  I&#8217;ve been paying my own freight my whole life and don&#8217;t want to pay yours or anyone elses.  I&#8217;ll take care of my family, you take care of yours.  Also, I suggest that as a British citizen, you stick to the problems in England.  As an American, I don&#8217;t give a #*>@ about what happens in England or how people govern themselves.  I&#8217;ve heard some lovely stories about your public health care system that doesn&#8217;t leave me all warm an fuzzy.  Brits seem to embrace the sacrifice of liberty on a regular  basis for an ever increasing big brother government.  That won&#8217;t fly here.</p>
<p>Edit:</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll stick by my contention that European&#8217;s need to mind their own #*$*@ business.  The only time you arrogant snobs need America is when your balls are in a vice from some petty tyrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatives, why do you think the public would put private health insurance out of business? by Future Political Prisoner</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/05/conservatives-why-do-you-think-a-public-option-will-put-private-health-care-insurance-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Future Political Prisoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/05/conservatives-why-do-you-think-a-public-option-will-put-private-health-care-insurance-out-of-business/#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>Your comparison is apples and oranges.

If Fed Ex and UPS were required to offer competing daily 1st class mail route delivery, with the same union guarantees enjoyed by the USPS employees - they would quickly be out of business.

Unless..   they could actually do that job more efficiently than the USPS..  wait a minute - I may be onto something here!  

Nah..   Like the Post Office - the Public Option would be shielded from competition by the private sector.  They would consistently be able to offer lower prices because they&#039;re not required to post a profit.  

But - like Walmart taking out local businesses - once the competition is gone - you&#039;d be stuck with the Public No Option.  And from that seed grows the weed of healthcare rationing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comparison is apples and oranges.</p>
<p>If Fed Ex and UPS were required to offer competing daily 1st class mail route delivery, with the same union guarantees enjoyed by the USPS employees &#8211; they would quickly be out of business.</p>
<p>Unless..   they could actually do that job more efficiently than the USPS..  wait a minute &#8211; I may be onto something here!  </p>
<p>Nah..   Like the Post Office &#8211; the Public Option would be shielded from competition by the private sector.  They would consistently be able to offer lower prices because they&#8217;re not required to post a profit.  </p>
<p>But &#8211; like Walmart taking out local businesses &#8211; once the competition is gone &#8211; you&#8217;d be stuck with the Public No Option.  And from that seed grows the weed of healthcare rationing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why some conservatives are against the public version of health reform? Lee competition scare you? by Smart Kat</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/07/30/why-are-some-conservatives-against-the-public-option-for-health-care-reform-does-competition-scare-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/07/30/why-are-some-conservatives-against-the-public-option-for-health-care-reform-does-competition-scare-you/#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>That is like we need a Public Option resteraunt to give the privately owned, profit motivated resuraunts some competition.

We do need to work for more of a competition between the many MANY insurance companies but not by making the tax payers through many billions into a government run program.  If that is needed, the excuse of &quot;competition&quot; is lame.  how would you like to compete against someone who doesn&#039;t need to make a profit and has a pretty much endless revenue source outside of the business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is like we need a Public Option resteraunt to give the privately owned, profit motivated resuraunts some competition.</p>
<p>We do need to work for more of a competition between the many MANY insurance companies but not by making the tax payers through many billions into a government run program.  If that is needed, the excuse of &#8220;competition&#8221; is lame.  how would you like to compete against someone who doesn&#8217;t need to make a profit and has a pretty much endless revenue source outside of the business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whether the high cost of medical care, influence public opinion on euthanasia? by Angel Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/06/does-the-high-cost-of-health-care-influence-public-opinion-on-euthanasia/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/06/does-the-high-cost-of-health-care-influence-public-opinion-on-euthanasia/#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If public universal health care is so terrible, why is the US the only developed country without it? by Yerba Mate</title>
		<link>http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/29/if-public-universal-health-care-is-so-terrible-why-is-the-us-the-only-developed-country-without-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4771</link>
		<dc:creator>Yerba Mate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ywcahealthandwellness.com/2010/08/29/if-public-universal-health-care-is-so-terrible-why-is-the-us-the-only-developed-country-without-it/#comment-4771</guid>
		<description>because we have the party of no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because we have the party of no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
